Aussie Atheist Bus Campaign – an update

A couple of days ago it came to my attention that the AFA’s Atheist Bus Campaign has hit another snag. From the transcript of the Religion Report radio broadcast the other day:

… the Atheist Foundation of Australia, who have been refused permission to buy advertising space on public transport.

You might have read in recent weeks that the British Humanist Association, assisted by crusading atheist Richard Dawkins, have been raising money to put their message on London buses. The ads, planned for January, will read, ‘There’s probably no god, now stop worrying and enjoy your life.’

And in Washington, buses are already trundling around with a Christmas message from the American Humanist Association: ‘Why believe in a god? Just be good, for goodness’ sake’.

Well the Atheist Foundation of Australia wants to mount its own campaign, and says that its members and supporters have pledged $16,000 to fund advertisements on buses in Australia. So they’ve approached APN Outdoor, the company that manages public transport advertising in most Australian capitals.

According to the Atheist Foundation’s president, David Nicholls, APN Outdoor said that they had problems with the wording of the proposed message. But then after the Foundation made two sets of changes to the wording, APN Outdoor said they simply weren’t able to accommodate them.

WHY? Just because. David speculates that APN has rejected any and all atheist bus slogans because of the cultural belief that religion has some sort of privileged status. Even mild criticism of religion is shunned.

I suggest you have a read of the transcript or listen to the podcast, it’s quite interesting, After the host finsishes talking to David he contunes the discussion with Greg Clarke, Director of the Macquarie Christian Studies Institute who is open to allowing the atheist bus slogans “as long as it’s done with a level of civility”, which it was.

The radio show continues with a discussion about a new book, ‘In Your Shoes: Interfaith Education for Australian Religious Educators’, which provides advice for teaching students about different religious traditions. Some interesting comments from the author.

Back to APN censoring advertising, it appears that it’s not just atheist slogans they refuse to advertise. APN has also refused to carry the Catholic’s Respect Life Office (RLO) anti-abortion adverts which were going to display graphic pictures [to scare women into not having abortions]. Whilst I think the idea of showing graphic pictures and trying to scare women into not having an abortion is not very productive and amounts to not much more than psycological warfare against women at a time they can be very vulnerable, I’m not sure it’s really up to the advertisers to be censors? Or is it? Who should be ultimately responsible for what gets advertised?

In the article about the RLO’s advertising ban, I thought it was ironic that the RLO are worried about women’s mental health following an abortion. According to them:

Many women seeking help had experienced substance abuse, anxiety, sleep disorders, suicidal thoughts, psychiatric illness, risk-taking behaviour and relationship problems as a result of their abortion.

Well I’ve heard the same thing about women who had found out they were pregnant and didn’t want the child. I’ve also heard of womens lives that have been completely ruined because they were coerced into having a child they didn’t really want, some of these women have experienced the exact same symptoms the RLO described. So who is right and who is wrong? Should abortion be banned because some women feel bad afterwards? NO, I don’t think so, in fact I think if abortion wasn’t so stigmatised, especially by the religious, and women were provided with non-judgemental guidance before, and afterwards if required, a lot less women would have psychological problems with abortion. What do you think?

One more Bus advert banned by APN, ‘The Chasers War on Everything’ DVD release was going to carry the slogan:

“The only good thing to come out of APEC.”

with pictures of their APEC stunt. However APN has banned the advert for being “too political”.

I’m starting to wonder how APN makes any money, as they seem to not want to advertise anything even remotely political or anti-religious.

Advertisements

11 Comments

Filed under abortion, activism, APEC, APN, atheism, atheist, Atheist Bus Campaign, billboard, Catholic, censorship, christianity, freedom of speech, politics, religion

11 responses to “Aussie Atheist Bus Campaign – an update

  1. Pingback: Six Things Meme « Oz Atheist’s Weblog

  2. Seems Australian Advertisers aren’t the only pathetic wimps and censors. The FFRF have also been having a hard time with their adverts lately. But this time they’re fighting back.

  3. Fucking unbelievable that in a country that doesn’t really give two shits about politics or religion.

  4. I can only sit here and shake my head. Sad.

  5. novparl

    There was a record in 1959 called the Battle of Kookamonga (sic), a parody of the Battle of New Orleans, of which Lonnie Donegan had the British hit. Wonder if it’s the same place.

    Seems the FFRF are right about the Constitution. Trouble is, going to law to get your rights is outrageously expensive.

    PS Keep me cockatoo cool, sport.

  6. John

    http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/11/uhoh_will_mysterious_helicopte.php

    “United Nations committee voted 85 – 50 in favour of a measure to condemn “defamation of religions.” The principal force behind the vote is the Organization of Islamic States, whose next goal is a full-force UN treaty.”

  7. Pingback: Atheist Foundation of Australia to complain to the Tasmanian Anti Discrimination Commission : Sean the Blogonaut

  8. Pingback: Atheist Foundation of Australia to complain to the Tasmanian Anti Discrimination Commission : My Blog

  9. Pingback: Atheist Foundation of Australia launches new forum | Sean the Blogonaut

  10. novparl

    Well, the London campaign has been launched, according to BBCtv London News on Tuesday. A big red bus with the “God probably doesn’t exist..” bedecked with 3 balloons was presented. Sadly, it was 0 degrees at the time. The celebs were Prof Dawkins (65), AC Grayling (boring philosopher, c.60) and journalist Polly Toytown (61). The reporter failed to find any Londoners who had a strong opinion one way or the other, except for one young man who thought the message was too vague.

    Just in: The Archsongster of Canterbury has just committed suicide.

  11. @novparl – lol

    the Americans have got their bus campaign up and running and there is also one planned for Barcelona in Spain, we still have nothing. At least today’s paper has noted this fact.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s